Here is a list of my books, together with a brief description of their content.


Anti-Libertarianism: Markets, Philosophy, and Myth (Routledge 1994):

In this book, I examine and dismantle the ‘libertarian’ (or ‘neo-liberal’) philosophical theories which dominated so much political an51rwhtdn1bl-_ac_us240_ql65_d economic policy during the 1980s, and which have remained a presence ever since. I argue that it would be more appropriate to describe (self-styled) libertarianism as ‘anti-libertarianism’. At the time of writing, it was one of the few books to tackle libertarian philosophy head-on by taking an ‘analytic’ approach. At any rate that is how it seemed to me. I wrote it at a time when philosophers of the Left were tending to pursue alternative avenues of their own. I thought this a mistake.

Critics said:  ‘a powerful and compelling critique’ (Res Publica); ‘spirited, intelligent and continually engaging’ (International Journal of Philosophical Studies);  ‘a withering critique of the “invisible-handism” that seduced the 1980s. (New Statesman).


Free Speech (Routledge 1998)

There is a tendency for defenders of free speech to pontificate rather than argue. Consider, for example, the widespread tendency to take lines from J.S.Mill’s On Liberty – for41jw1r8lhll-_ac_us240_ql65_ example, his assertion that ‘All silencing of discussion is an assumption of infallibility’ – out of context, – Well – it’s a serious subject. However, it would be more helpful to examine the main arguments for free speech in detail and to figure out what their ramifications really are. That is what I try to do in this book It has now become a key text, – or so I believe.

Critics said: ‘Even if the literature were more extensive, Alan Haworth’s Free Speech would be a welcome addition to it, but, especially under the circumstances, this is a very important contribution indeed’. (Mind)


Understanding the Political Philosophers: From Ancient to Modern Times (Routledge 2004 & 2012)

In this book I discuss the arguments advanced by the major philosophers of the western political tradition while, at the same time, setting them within the context of the historical events by which they were motivated to write41j412h6l-_ac_us240_ql65_. There is, thus, a historical element to the book, although the emphasis is philosophical. As I say in the introduction to the second edition, It is my view that you cannot qualify as at all politically literate unless you have some knowledge of [the ideas I discuss]’. The second edition is an expanded and  updated version of the first.

Critics said: ‘It is my view that this book will be of interest to a very wide audience. (Essays in Philosophy); ‘it is unusual to become so absorbed in the text as to find oneself reading it for pure intellectual pleasure. This is what happened when I read Alan Haworth’s engaging book. (Times Higher Education Supplement.)


Free Speech: All that Matters (Hodder and Stoughton 2015)

In this book, I take up some of the themes I developed in my earlier book on free speech. It is meant to be an introductory text for the i416qxpt4x8l-_ac_us240_ql65_ntelligent general reader. I have yet to come across any critical reviews.